How is an impairment evaluated within the framework of workers' compensation?

Evaluating an impairment within the framework of workers' compensation is fundamentally concerned with determining the permanent loss of function or use resulting from a workplace injury or illness. Impairment refers to the actual physiological or psychological deficit that impacts a worker's ability to perform specific tasks or activities.

This evaluation is typically conducted after a worker has reached maximum medical improvement, meaning their condition is stable and unlikely to change significantly. The assessment often involves objective medical evaluations, including diagnostic tests and physical examinations that quantify the extent of the impairment. The focus on permanent loss of function or use is crucial because it helps in quantifying the impact of the injury on the worker's daily life and their ability to earn a living.

Other options do not accurately reflect the accepted methods of impairment evaluation in workers' compensation. For instance, the worker's own assessment may provide insight into their experience, but it is not the basis for formal evaluations due to its subjective nature. Considering temporary symptoms only disregards the long-term implications and does not account for permanent impairments which are critical for determining compensation. Similarly, while medical professionals contribute to the evaluation, their subjective opinions alone do not provide a comprehensive view of the impairment without objective tests and assessments.