What is an additional step in appealing if the ALJ decision is unsatisfactory?

The correct answer is review by the Workers' Compensation Board because, in the process of appeals related to workers' compensation cases, a decision made by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) can typically be reviewed by the Workers' Compensation Board. This board serves as a higher authority that can examine the ALJ's decision, ensuring that it aligns with legal standards and statutory requirements.

The review process allows parties dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision an opportunity for further evaluation, where they can present additional arguments or evidence. The Workers' Compensation Board plays a crucial role in upholding fair practices and provides an essential check on the decisions rendered at the ALJ level.

Other options provided do not align with standard procedures in this context. For instance, a direct appeal to the governor is not a formal or appropriate step within the workers' compensation system. Requesting a second ALJ hearing is not typically a viable option because the initial hearing is intended to be comprehensive. An assessment by an independent auditor does not fit within the framework governing appeals either, as it does not pertain to the judicial or administrative review processes related to workers' compensation disputes.